| |
browse.develop.com
Browse.develop.com is a community that was established to collect and
organize valuable web information. Our technical staff have selected and
indexed information and courses that they feel will help you stay
current on best practices across the SDLC.
|
3 Articles match "Unit Testing"
See all articles with
"Unit Testing"
| The Latest from www.leastprivilege.com | MORE | | ASP.NET WebAPI Security 2: Identity Architecture is static, and static is bad for testing” chant. is a getter/setter and, in fact I find it beneficial to be able to set different security contexts in unit tests before calling in some logic. Pedro has beaten me to the punch with a detailed post (and diagram) about the WebAPI hosting architecture. So go read his post first, then come back so we can have a closer look at what that means for security. Pedro nicely shows the integration into the web host. The ConvertRequest method does the following: Create a new HttpRequestMessage. Why so generic? Do I like that? Stay tuned. www.leastprivilege.com - Thursday, March 8, 2012 What I don’t like about WIF’s Claims-based Authorization In a unit testing situation (like an MVC controller) you typically want to test the logic in the function – not the security check. In my last post I wrote about what I like about WIF’s proposed approach to authorization – I also said that I definitely would build upon that infrastructure for my own systems. But implementing such a system is a little harder as it could be. Here’s why (and that’s purely my perspective): First of all WIF’s authorization comes in two “modes”. Per-request authorization. For SOAP the SOAP action gets passed in. Imperative authorization. www.leastprivilege.com - Friday, April 29, 2011 Testing Security Code with Moles I am by far no (unit) testing expert. But I always found it odd that I sometimes have to re-structure code to make it explicitly unit-testable. personally like this pattern in the.NET Framework – but it is not ideal for testing. One typical example is code that relies on some sort of context – e.g. Thread.CurrentPrincipal. Recently I ran across Moles which is a mocking and stubs framework from Microsoft Research which has some features that can help here. Inspired by this video – I gave it a try. Thread ))]. namespace SecurityTest. {. TestClass ]. TestMethod ]. www.leastprivilege.com - Monday, February 1, 2010 | | The Best from www.leastprivilege.com | MORE | | ASP.NET WebAPI Security 2: Identity Architecture is static, and static is bad for testing” chant. is a getter/setter and, in fact I find it beneficial to be able to set different security contexts in unit tests before calling in some logic. Pedro has beaten me to the punch with a detailed post (and diagram) about the WebAPI hosting architecture. So go read his post first, then come back so we can have a closer look at what that means for security. Pedro nicely shows the integration into the web host. The ConvertRequest method does the following: Create a new HttpRequestMessage. Why so generic? Do I like that? Stay tuned. www.leastprivilege.com - Thursday, March 8, 2012 What I don’t like about WIF’s Claims-based Authorization In a unit testing situation (like an MVC controller) you typically want to test the logic in the function – not the security check. In my last post I wrote about what I like about WIF’s proposed approach to authorization – I also said that I definitely would build upon that infrastructure for my own systems. But implementing such a system is a little harder as it could be. Here’s why (and that’s purely my perspective): First of all WIF’s authorization comes in two “modes”. Per-request authorization. For SOAP the SOAP action gets passed in. Imperative authorization. www.leastprivilege.com - Friday, April 29, 2011 Testing Security Code with Moles I am by far no (unit) testing expert. But I always found it odd that I sometimes have to re-structure code to make it explicitly unit-testable. personally like this pattern in the.NET Framework – but it is not ideal for testing. One typical example is code that relies on some sort of context – e.g. Thread.CurrentPrincipal. Recently I ran across Moles which is a mocking and stubs framework from Microsoft Research which has some features that can help here. Inspired by this video – I gave it a try. Thread ))]. namespace SecurityTest. {. TestClass ]. TestMethod ]. www.leastprivilege.com - Monday, February 1, 2010 | %>
102 Articles match "Unit Testing"
See all articles with
"Unit Testing"
| The Latest from DevelopMentor | MORE | | Testing triangles, pyramids and circles, and UAT 'A few months ago Markus Gartner introduced me to the Testing Triangle, or Testing Pyramid. It looks like this: If you Google you will find a few slightly different version and some go by the name of Testing Pyramid. This triangle is actually pretty similar to a diagram I’ve been drawing for a while when I do Agile training: But it occurs to me the triangle should be pushed to the side, and when you do that you can add some axis which add more information: At the base the, Unit Tests, there are lots and lots of tests and they typically execute in milliseconds. Allan Kelly's Blog - Friday, May 24, 2013 Unit testing code depending on the ASP.NET #WebApi HttpClient 'In a previous post I showed how to unit test an ASP.NET WebAPI Controller. Assuming for a moment the client part is also written in C# we should test that as well. Testing the BooksClient class. If we want to test this class we need to pass in an HttpClient object. This might not sound like a big deal but as this class doesn’t implement an interface we can’t use most of the standard mocking frameworks like Moq to replace the HttpClient with a test fake. Testing the GetBooks() function. test is pretty simple. Testing am HTTP POST action. The Problem Solver - Monday, May 20, 2013 Unit testing a ASP.NET WebAPI controller Testing a simple ApiController that gets data Suppose we have the following ASP.NET WebAPI Controller with two Get methods, the first returns the complete list of books and the second returns the book with the requested ID. Testing the Get() method. The Get() method that returns all books is easy enough to test. Testing the Get(id) method. Testing for getting with an invalid ID is equally simple: 1: [TestMethod]. Testing an HTTP PUT operation. Testing an update using an HTTP put is just as simple as a testing a get action. 8: 9: }. 11: {. The Problem Solver - Sunday, May 12, 2013 | -
| The Best from DevelopMentor | MORE | - Significant Advances in Unit Testing Windows Workflow
This post describes a unit testing library for testing Windows Workflow Foundations. Rather it's a library that can be used in conjunction with any of these testing frameworks. Download the library with sample test project here: Kennedy.WorkflowTesting.zip (216 KB). First a Little History: Last September I posted this teaser entitled Unit Testing Coming to a Workflow Near You. In that previous post, I highlighted what I could determine to be the current state-of-the-art with regard to unit testing workflows, circa September 2008. Michael C. Kennedy's Weblog - Sunday, January 18, 2009 - Article: Avoiding 5 Common Pitfalls in Unit Testing
Llewellyn Falco and I recently wrote an article for DevelopMentor's Developments newsletter entitled Avoiding 5 Common Pitfalls in Unit Testing. Avoiding 5 Common Pitfalls in Unit Testing. When I started out with unit tests, I was enthralled with the promise of ease and security that they would bring to my projects. In practice, however, the theory of sustainable software through unit tests started to break down. Unit Tests have become more trouble than they are worth.". When tests would stop working, we just ignored them. Michael C. Kennedy's Weblog - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - Unit Testing Coming to a Workflow Near You
[Update: See the follow up post "Significant Advances in Unit Testing Windows Workflow" ]. However you won't find very much support for Test Driven Development (TDD) or unit testing in general. In fact the architecture that makes Windows Workflow powerful (strict separation of workflow, activities, and the host for example) really gets in the way of unit tests. There has been some work done on unit testing Windows Workflows. Here's some links: Unit Testing Activities with Windows Workflow Foundation by Ron Jacobs. Michael C. Kennedy's Weblog - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - TDD Invades Space Invaders
As a follow-up to our " Avoiding 5 Common Pitfalls in Unit Testing " article we did a webcast where we took a problem from the audience and solved it live and unrehearsed on stage. The thing to remember is that all of this was done for the sole purpose of creating a recipe for a scenario we could test. Create a new test project. We made it to step 4 during our presentation (download code below) and estimate another 15 minutes would have had the whole scenario done, tested, and well-factored. Tags: DevelopMentor Screencasts Talks Unit Testing Michael C. Kennedy's Weblog - Wednesday, October 28, 2009 - Test-Driven Cameras
wish people had this same reaction to the idea of writing code without first writing tests (TDD). Tests give you the chance: To see what you are going to write, BEFORE you write it. If you haven’t already, here’s a great place to start learning to Test-Driven Development ? If you are already writing tests, here’s a free library to make test even easier to write? Unit Testing TDDI am getting old. The other day I was hanging around with my friend, Ike Ellis. He told me a story about his kids. The first question they asked was “Where is the picture?” DevelopMentor Courses - Wednesday, September 7, 2011 %>
| |   |
